What critical launch risks does your app have?

34 automated safety checks on auth, billing, admin, and architecture. Results in seconds. Zero login. One command.

Scan any GitHub repo

Paste a public GitHub repo URL. Get a safety report in minutes.

Public repos only. Source code is deleted immediately after scan.
Private repo? Run npx @vibecodiq/cli scan locally instead.

Or run it from your terminal

Trust Score — is your app safe to launch?

terminal

# Run safety scan (auth, billing, admin)

npx @vibecodiq/cli scan

Trust Score: 74 / 100 (Grade C)

Verdict: NOT READY FOR PRODUCTION

Breakdown:

Auth ███████░░░ 6/8 pass 1 fail

Billing █████░░░░░ 4/8 pass 2 fail

Admin ██░░░░░░░░ 1/4 pass 2 fail

6 issues found (4 critical, 2 important)

Full report: vibecodiq.com/r/abc123

The scan generates a Trust Score (0–100) with a letter grade based on how many safety checks your app passes across auth, billing, and admin layers.

A–B

Low to moderate risk

C

Elevated risk

D–F

High to critical risk

Public: Trust Score grade, module pass/fail counts, timestamp

Private: Vulnerability details, file paths, code snippets, fix prompts

Share the good parts. Keep the details private.

Based on covered scope. Not a certification.

AI Chaos Index — is your code structurally stable?

terminal

# Run architecture scan

npx @vibecodiq/cli scan --architecture

AI Chaos Index: 72 / 100

Risk Band: Unstable

Breakdown:

RC01 Architecture Drift ██████░░░░ 48

RC02 Dependency Corruption ███████░░░ 55

RC03 Structural Entropy ███░░░░░░░ 25

RC04 Test Infrastructure █████████░ 82

RC05 Deployment Safety ██████████ 100

Primary Risk Vector: RC04 — Test Infrastructure

Full report: vibecodiq.com/r/abc123

The architecture scan measures structural stability — how well your code is organized, how isolated modules are, and how likely AI-generated changes are to cause regressions. Scored 0–100 (higher = more chaos).

0–30

Clean architecture

31–60

Structural issues present

61–100

High regression risk

8 checks: Business logic isolation, domain boundaries, file size, cross-domain imports, CI/CD, tests

Key question: Will the next AI-generated change break something?

Based on 5 root causes of structural failure in AI-generated codebases.

Every finding comes with an AI fix prompt

Paste the fix prompt into Lovable, Cursor, or Bolt. Your AI builder applies the fix. Rescan to confirm.

AI Fix Prompt — Auth: Server-side verification missing

Add server-side auth verification to all API routes.

In every file under app/api/, add this check at the

top of the handler function:

const supabase = createServerClient(cookies())

const { data: { user } } = await supabase.auth.getUser()

if (!user) return NextResponse.json({ error: 'Unauthorized' }, { status: 401 })

AI-fixable: Simple fixes (headers, config, validation) — high success rate

AI-fixable with validation: Complex fixes (RLS, role guards) — needs verification

Expert-only: Architecture issues (Stripe state, RBAC) — escalate to expert

Need expert eyes?

The free scan gives you automated findings. A Launch Readiness Assessment adds human review, prioritized findings, and a clear Fix or Rebuild recommendation.

Launch Readiness Assessment

$295

48h delivery

Automated scan + expert validation within covered scope
~5 extra manual checks the scanner can't detect
3 PDF reports: Trust Score, AI Chaos Index, Fix vs Rebuild
Clear Fix or Rebuild recommendation with pricing
1 follow-up question included (async, 48h)

Limited-scope assessment. Not a certification. You decide whether to ship.

Works with your AI builder

Vibecodiq works with any AI coding tool. Scan your repo, get findings, paste fix prompts — your builder applies the fix.

Find out where you stand.

32 free safety checks on auth, billing, admin, and architecture. Results in seconds.

Static code analysis. May include false positives/negatives.