Your AI app works today. Will it survive the next 10 features?
Most AI-generated codebases degrade silently. We measure structural risk before it becomes production failure. No fixing, no upselling — just an honest diagnosis.
Quick Scan — $297
What it is: Automated + lightweight analysis of your codebase. You get a quantified score, the top issues, and a personal video walkthrough — in 24 hours.
You don't just get a PDF. You get a 5-minute video briefing where an architect walks you through your specific risks.
What you get:
- AI Chaos Index (ACI) score (0–100)
- Top 3–5 critical issues identified
- Root cause severity breakdown (RC01–RC05)
- 3–5 page PDF report with risk band analysis
- Personal video walkthrough of your results (3–5 min)
- Clear next-step recommendation
Timeline: 24 hours • Price: $297
Conducted personally. No outsourcing. No automated template output.
This is not: a bug hunt, a code style review, a performance benchmark, or a generic GPT report. It's a structural risk diagnostic.
Full Architecture Audit — $900
What it is: Deep manual review of your codebase architecture. We map every structural risk and give you a concrete upgrade path.
What you get:
- Full RC01–RC05 root cause analysis with file-level mapping
- Failure Pattern detection (21 known patterns)
- AI Chaos Score with severity breakdown per root cause
- Production Readiness Report (PDF, 15–20 pages)
- Architecture diagram: current state vs. target state
- Prioritized upgrade path with effort estimates
- Video walkthrough of findings and recommendations
Timeline: 2–3 days • Price: $900
See It In Action: Before → During → After
We ran the AI Chaos Index on three versions of the same app — an AI-generated SaaS dashboard — to show exactly what the remediation journey looks like.
- 8 files, monolithic frontend (1,084 LOC)
- Zero tests, zero CI/CD
- No architecture, no documentation
- Domain structure started (1 of 3)
- Frontend reduced from 1,084 to 174 LOC
- First tests added, legacy isolated
Collapse risk reduced. Structural debt remains.
View full analysis →- 3 domains, clean separation of concerns
- Tests across all domains, CI/CD pipeline
- Safe to scale, safe to hire
Not zero risk. Controlled complexity.
View full analysis →Rescue = Cap phase (structural stabilization only). Bridge & Grow add the new architecture layer and isolated modules.
Same codebase (~2,200 LOC). Same functionality. The difference is structure — and structure is what we fix.
AI Chaos Index — Risk Bands
| Score | Zone | What It Means | Next Step |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–25 | Stable | Minor improvements recommended | Deploy with confidence |
| 26–50 | Risky | Structural weaknesses present | Plan remediation |
| 51–75 | High | Active degradation likely | Stabilize before scaling |
| 76–100 | Critical | Production instability imminent | Architecture intervention needed |
ACI does not measure bugs. It measures structural failure risk.
Based on dependency graph analysis, slice cohesion metrics, and architectural drift signals.
Every recommendation is honest. If your app is fine, we'll tell you.
Is This For You?
This is for you if:
- You built with Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, v0, or similar AI tools
- Your MVP is live and you're adding features weekly
- You've noticed regressions or unexplained breakage
- You have no clear architecture owner on the team
This is NOT for you if:
- You have an established engineering team with architecture discipline
- Your codebase is an early prototype under 1k LOC
- You already have CI + test coverage above 60%
Trust
No fixing, no upselling. The audit is a standalone product. You get the report. What you do with it is your decision.
Pre-Acceptance Gate. We don't accept every project. If your codebase can't be meaningfully analyzed, we'll decline.
Read-only access only. We never need write access to your repository. Read-only access for 24 hours is enough for the diagnostic.
Open methodology. Our analysis is based on ASA — an open architecture standard. asastandard.org
FAQ
What do you need from me?
Read-only access to your GitHub repository for 24 hours. That's it. No calls, no onboarding, no setup.
Is the Quick Scan automated?
It combines automated structural analysis with a personal review. You get a PDF report and a video walkthrough — not a generic template.
What if my score is low (good)?
We'll tell you honestly. If your codebase is structurally sound, the report will confirm that. No upselling.
What's the difference between Quick Scan and Full Audit?
Quick Scan ($297) gives you a score, top issues, and a recommendation in 24 hours. Full Audit ($900) maps every structural risk with file-level detail, architecture diagrams, and a prioritized upgrade path in 2–3 days.
What tech stacks do you analyze?
Next.js, React, TypeScript, Python (FastAPI/Flask), PostgreSQL (Supabase, Neon). Built with Cursor, Lovable, Bolt.new, Replit, or v0.
The path to stability
Four phases. Each is a separate engagement. You decide at each step whether to continue.
Diagnose
Architecture Audit
Structural failure patterns identified. AI Chaos Score. Prioritized roadmap.
OPEN — $297You are hereStabilize
Cap, Bridge & Grow
Freeze legacy. Fix boundaries. Zero-rewrite architecture migration.
POST-AUDITLearn more →Deploy
Production Launch
Auth, database, payments, domain & SSL. Production-ready in days.
POST-AUDITLearn more →Enforce
Continuous Protection
CI/CD safety pipeline. Boundary linting. Automated guardrails.
POST-AUDITLearn more →Remediation services are available after diagnostic confirmation. Because structural failures differ significantly between codebases, stabilization is performed only after forensic analysis identifies the root causes.
Start with a Quick Scan.
24 hours. One score. Complete clarity.